Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:05

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
A guide to sky-watching from summer to autumn - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Circle’s buzzy IPO was a big hit. Now comes the hard part. - MarketWatch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Iconic ‘90s Actress, 52, Flaunts Figure in Black Swimsuit While Yachting - parade.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Xbox sale round-up June 17, 2025 - TrueAchievements
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Is the Kia Tasman the ugliest ute of all time?
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
John Cena cuts pipe bomb promo towards CM Punk at the end of WWE Smackdown - NoDQ.com
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.